Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93833-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18250 of 2025 Petitioner :- Munna Lal Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Reema Pandey,Saurabh Raj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Narendra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in considering and taking decision on his representation/reminder dated April 1, 2025 submitted for providing new electric connection. 3. Upon hearing the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perusing the record, we are of the view that the prayer of the petitioner is innocuous and may be granted. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation/reminder dated April 1, 2025 of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date. An opportunity of hearing should be granted to the petitioner before passing a reasoned order. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Rakesh (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH MEHTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad