127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1935 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.09.2025 Vivek Mittal .......... Petitioner Versus Moti Lal Bindal and another .......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Vansham Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saarib Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner informs that the possession of demised premises has already been handed over by the respondent(s)-tenant(s) to the petitioner-landlord; thus no cause survives in the present petition as the same has become infructuous. [2] Disposed off as infructuous. [3] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. September 16, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra’ JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2025.09.16 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document