2025:MHC:1569 WP No. 23882 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 23882 of 2025 1. S.Malar W/o. C. S Aravanan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board Rep By Managing Director, No. 5 Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2.The Superintending Engineer Division-9 Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Perumbakam, Chennai 600 119. 3.The Estate Officer Estate Office 9, Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Semmancheri, Chennai 600 119. 4.Tamilnadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd Rep By its Managing Director, “Dugar Towers”, 6 th Floor, Old No. 34 New No. 123, Marshalls Road, Egmore Chennai 600 008. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23882 of 2025 5.Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India (TRAI) Rep By Secretary Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, New Delhi 110 002. 6.RAMACHANDRAN Cable TV Operator, No. 2517 Kannakinagar, Thuraipakkam, Chennai 600 097 Cable TV Operator Respondent(s) PRAYER Call for records of the 2 nd respondent in the order dated 02.05.2025 in Ref No. Se.Mu.Ka.En.Ne.Po.Ka-9/03/2025 relating to allots 300 additional connections to the 6 th respondent to operation of the Cable TV in Perumbakkam housing board, Chennai and quash and direct the 2 nd respondent to allot 150 connections to the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Edwin Yovan Raj For Respondent: Mrs.K.Indumathy Venkatesh Standing Counsel for R1-3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the 2 nd respondent in Se.Mu.Ka.En.Ne.Po.Ka-9/03/2025, dated 02.05.2025 relating to allotment of 300 additional connections to the 6 th respondent for operating cable TV in Perumbakkam Housing Board and to direct the 2 nd respondent to allot 150 connections to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23882 of 2025 2. Heard Mr.D.Edwin Yovan Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Indumathy Venkatesh, learned Standing Counsel for the 1 st to 3 rd respondents. 3. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that she has been allotted 360 connections, whereas the 6 th respondent has been allotted 1050 connections to operate cable TV in the Perumbakkam Housing Board flats. 4. In the considered view of this Court, this Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot be wasting its time on a decision taken by the Board to allot a certain number of cable TV connections to a particular individual. This Court cannot decide how many connections must be given to each cable TV operator. If such writ petitions are entertained, this Court will be wasting its time with such frivolous litigation. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. 03-07-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23882 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23882 of 2025 To 1. Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board Rep By Managing Director, No. 5 Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2.The Superintending Engineer Division-9 Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Perumbakam, Chennai 600 119. 3.The Estate Officer Estate Office 9, Tamilnadu Urban Habitat Development Board, Semmancheri, Chennai 600 119. 4.Tamilnadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd Rep By its Managing Director, “Dugar Towers”, 6 th Floor, Old No. 34 New No. 123, Marshalls Road, Egmore Chennai 600 008. 5.Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India (TRAI) Rep By Secretary Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, New Delhi 110 002. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23882 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. gd WP No. 23882 of 2025 03-07-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis