Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63231 (BOM)

M/S ANNCHAL COLLECTION LTD., THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KOLKATTA v. M/S KSL AND INDUSTRIES LTD., MUMBAI

WP/3909/2019 · 2025-12-18

Shri Pravin S Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23 wp 3909-2019.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3909/2019 M/s Aanchal Collection Ltd., Kolkatta, West Bengal, through its Managing Director Vs. M/s KSL and Industries Ltd., Mumbai-13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATE : 18.12.2025 1. In the present matter by the order dated 26.10.2023 on the application of Advocate Shri S.R.Charpe, for withdrawal of his appearance, this Court has discharged him from appearance on behalf of the petitioner in the matter. 2. Immediately, thereafter, the notice was issued to the petitioner for engagement of another Counsel. The office note shows that the notice for engagement of another Counsel to petitioner was returned unserved with bailiff remarks that the given address of the noticee does not exist. In the present matter, no one is appearing on behalf of the respondent also. 3. The record shows that due to this contingency, this matter is not proceeded further. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare