Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6323 (JHR)

SACHIN DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1534/2025 · 2025-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:19727 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1534 of 2025 ------ Sachin Das, aged about 21 Year, son of Sahdev Das @ Sahdev Mahra, resident of village –Ghasko, Post Office –Parejori & Police Station –Devipur & District –Deoghar, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 17.07.2025 I.A. No. 7894 of 2025 Heard the parties. This interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of this bail application. Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No. 1534 of 2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.135 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D/84C of I.T. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cybercrime. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that there is no money trail involved in this case and only because two mobile phones along with three sim cards have been recovered from the petitioner, hence, he has been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.12.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-10 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.135 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/