Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 63171 (ALL)

SUSHILA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/7427/2025 · 2025-07-09

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:109985 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7427 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sushila Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Shukla,Prabhakar Awasthi,Vinay Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the District Inspector of Schools to forthwith ensure payment of pensionary benefit in favour of husband of the petitioner and also family pension treating the husband of the petitioner to be regularized in terms of Section 33 Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education (Services Selection Board) Act, 1982 to be taken within shortest period of time which may be specified by this Hon'ble Court in extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that his representation which is pending before respondent no.4, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri D.K.Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.4 within two weeks from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.4 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Pratima (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad