Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 63116 (BOM)
SAU. ANUSHA W/O YOGESH PERKEWAR v. YOGESH S/O RAMESH PERKEWAR
MCA/497/2022 · 2025-12-18
Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63116 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 63116 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
14 mca 497-2022.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (TR.) NO.497/2022 Sau. Anusha w/o Yogesh Perkewar Vs. Yogesh s/o Ramesh Perkewar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 18.12.2025
1. In the present matter, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant on last date sought discharge as he is not in receipt of instructions in the matter. Therefore, this Court issued notice on the applicant to engage another Counsel in the matter. However, the office note shows that the notice issued on the applicant on his given address, received back unserved for want of correct address.
2. In view of this, it is not possible to continue the present proceedings. Hence, the application stands disposed of.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL J.) R.S. Sahare