- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:7514-DB RP No. 200048 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REVIEW PETITION NO. 200048 OF 2025 BETWEEN: MAHEBOOB PASHA S/O. BASUMIYA, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: EX. DIST. CO-ORDINATOR, ZILLA PANCHAYAT, RAICHUR-584 101, R/O. NEAR OLD PANCHAYAT OFFICE, HUTTI, TQ: LINGASUGURU, DIST: RAICHUR-584122. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUSHIT GANACHARI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. AMEER SHUKLA IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-09. 2. SRI. PANDVE RAHUL TUKARAM IAS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYAT, RAICHUR-584 101. MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.12.11 12:43:56 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:7514-DB RP No. 200048 of 2025 3. SRI. UMESH THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUK PANCHAYAT, LINGASUGURU-584 122, DIST: RAICHUR. 4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-09. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MAYA T.RAJANNA, HCGP FOR R1 AND R4) THIS REVIEW PETITION IN CCC NO.200048/2025 IS FILED U/S. 114 R/W ORDER XLVII RULE 1 AND 2 OF THE CPC PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION AND RECALL THE ORDER DATED 14.11.2024 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN C.C.C.NO.200085/2024 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER PASSED IN LETTER AND SPIRIT AND TO PASS ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDERS AS DEEMED NECESSARY IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:7514-DB RP No. 200048 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS) As noticed in our earlier orders, while disposing of the contempt petition on 14.11.2024 liberty was granted to the complainant/review petitioner herein to further place any material as pointed out in the endorsement dated 02.09.2024 before the concerned authority and it was further directed that, if the material is placed, the respondents shall re-consider the claim in respect of TA and DA. 2. Learned counsel for the review petitioner seeks to contend that although materials have been placed before the concerned authority, the concerned authority is not ready to consider the claim of the petitioner. 3. In the considered opinion of this court, such further developments would give fresh cause of action for the review petitioner to raise a challenge, if adverse orders are passed against the review petitioner. At any rate, a - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:7514-DB RP No. 200048 of 2025 review petition to consider or re-open the contempt case would not arise. 4. In that view of the matter, the review petition is dismissed. 5. Delay of 191 days in filing the review petition is also not condoned. The review petition is required to be dismissed on the ground of delay also. Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE MBS Ct:vh List No.: 19 Sl No.: 2