Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6311 (CHH)

M/S HOTEL SHUVBH (A UNIT OF LABH COMPLEX), v. State of Chhattisgarh,

WPT/30/2018 · 2025-03-26

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14537 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPT No. 30 of 2018 1 - M/s Hotel Shuvbh (A unit of Labh Complex), A Partnership Firm Having Its business at 4/134, Fafadih Chowk, Raipur through one of its Partners Kawaljeet Singh Chawla, S/o Shri Pritam Singh Chawla, Aged About 49 Years, Resident of 25, Panchsheel Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Tourism, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Vanijyik Kar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tourism Promotion Policy Committee Through Its Member Secretary/Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Tourism Board, Paryatan Bhawan, Indira Gandhi Road, Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mt. Jitendra Kumar Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Neelabh Dubey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Government Advocate SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2025.03.26 15:16:54 +0530 2 S B.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 26/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the remedy available under the provisions of CG Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest and Penalty Act, 2023 for settlement. He would further submit that, without proof of withdrawal of the petition, the prayer for settlement cannot be entertained. 2. Considering the aforesaid submission, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the instant petition. 3. Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner. 4. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the petitioner after retaining a photocopy of the same in the file. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Shyna