Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6308 (PNJ)

PAWAN BHATIA v. DEVENDER DAHIYA

COCP/2735/2025 · 2026-04-16

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 105 Pawan Bh Sh. Deven Engineerin CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding 06.3.2025 Court in C Haryana an order was 2025. vide order by co-ordi granted in passed in COCP-2735-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2735 o Date of decision an Bhatia Versus Devender Dahiya, Engineer-in-Chi neering Department, Haryana AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Nikhil Lather, Advocate f Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is f eedings against the respondent for not .2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a t in CWP-6277-2025 titled as “Sudh ana and others”, in which while issuin r was ordered in the same terms as It is submitted by learned cou order dated 06.3.2025, interim order in ordinate Bench of this Court in C ted in favour of the petitioners. Perus ed in above said CWP-1071-2025 sh 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2735 of 2025 cision :-28.05.2025 …..Petitioner Chief (HOD), Public Health …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA cate for ocate AAG, Haryana. is for initiation of contempt or not complying the order dated by a co-ordinate Bench of this udhir and others vs. State of issuing notice of motion, interim ms as in connected CWP-1071- ed counsel for the petitioner that rder in the same terms as granted rt in CWP-1071-2025 had been Perusal of order dated 17.1.2025 025 shows that operation of the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.29 11.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document impugned hearing. L petitioners Nigam Por petitioners. Anil Chauh petitioners, Rozgar Ni petitioners State, lear contempt p undertaking present con May 28, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2735-2025 (O & M) gned order had been directed to be s ng. Learned counsel submits that ioners were required to be taken in m Portal. However, the same has ioners. Learned counsel for the State Chauhan, XEN, informs that the pers ioners, had already been put on the p ar Nigam. It is submitted that the ioners shall also be done within a perio In view of the statement made , learned counsel for the petitione empt petition be disposed of at this stag Disposed of. Rule stands discharged. However, in case the need rtaking, the petitioners would be at lib nt contempt petition. Pending application(s), if any, , 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 to be stayed till the next date of that in view of the same, the en in Haryana Kaushal Rozgar e has not been granted to the State, on instructions from Shri e persons similarly situate as the n the portal of Haryana Kaushal at the needful in respect of the a period of two weeks. t made by learned counsel for the titioners prays that the present his stage. needful is not done, as per e at liberty to seek revival of the if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.29 11.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document