IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 138 SUKHVIR SINGH AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the very outse submitted that the petitioner 21.05.2025 before the their grievances as been considered and no action has that at this stage, the issued to respondent No. aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: SUKHVIR SINGH AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Rajender Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7 and to take action on dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Superintendent of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the been considered and no action has been taken thereon. that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are respondent No. 2- Superintendent said representation filed by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.5441 of 2025 Date of decision: 23.05.2025 …. Petitioners …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation t, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Hisar (Annexure P-5) raising petition but the same has not yet been taken thereon. He further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are of Police, Hisar to decide the said representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action of the the s their representation has recently filed a representation on raising same has not yet further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are decide the necessary action Jyoti 2025.05.23 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless t respondents would provide and liberty. 23.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.5441 of 2025 Notice of motion. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent ful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.5441 of 2025 -2- Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana, who is present in Court, accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the ful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with o say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, the paperbook be , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.05.23 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document