HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD FIRST APPEAL No. - 1 of 1996 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE SANDEEP JAIN, J. None is present for the appellant. Since the learned counsel for the appellant has been elevated to this Court, as such, vide order dated 23.04.2025, a notice was sent to the appellant for engaging another counsel. That notice has not been served on the appellant because of insufficient address but the registered letter has not been returned back undelivered. In view of this, service is deemed to be sufficient on the appellant but none is present on his behalf. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. The impugned judgement and decree dated 14.11.1995 of the trial court is affirmed. September 11, 2025 Rama Kant Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Pankaj Bhatia Counsel for Respondent(s) : S.A. Gilani (Sandeep Jain,J.) Madan Singh .....Appellant(s) Sri Akbar Ali And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAMA KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad