1 2025:CGHC:6503 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 724 of 2025 1 - Manjeet Singh Saluja S/o Harbhajan Singh Aged About 62 Years Duggal Colony, Shastri Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Collector, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Faiz Kazi, Advocate For State : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Pl For Resp. No.3 : Mr. Anand Kesharwani, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 05/02/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition may be disposed of permitting the petitioner to make a detailed representation to respondent/competent authority for the grievances projected in the writ petition and respondent/competent authority may be directed to consider and RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.02.06 10:50:04 +0530 2 decide the same within the reasonable period of time in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that they have no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. Be that as it may, after considering the submissions made by the both the parties at bar and on perusal of the documents available on record, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, permitting the petitioner to make a detailed representation before the respondent No.2/competent authority projecting all his grievances as projected in this writ petition along with the copy of petition within 30 days from today and in turn respondent No.2/competent authority is expected to consider and decide the same within the period of 120 days from submission of such representation in accordance with the relevant rules and law applicable to the case of petitioner. 4. If any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he may avail the remedy available under the law. 5. This Court does not express anything on the merits of this case. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul