Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:89200-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17049 of 2025 Petitioner :- Piyush Kumar Azad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent no.2/Superintendent of Police, Mau in considering the representation of the petitioners dated April 15, 2025. 3. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.2/Superintendent of Police, Mau should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioners dated April 15, 2025. 4. Accordingly, the respondent no.2/Superintendent of Police, Mau is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioners dated April 15, 2025 within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 26.5.2025 Dev (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad