Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6298 (PNJ)

ACL WINE PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH NISHANT TANGRI v. UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ORS

CWP/17772/2025 · 2026-03-23

Deepak Manchanda, Suvir Sehgal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 134 CWP-17772-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 23.03.2026 ACL WINE PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH NISHANT TANGRI … Petitioner Versus UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ORS ... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate and Ms. Mona Yadav, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Sumeet Jain, Addl. Standing counsel and Ms. Mahima Dogra, Junior Panel Counsel for respondent U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Arun Abrol, Advocate for the applicants. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Concededly, petitioner has been granted L-2 and L-14A for the year 2025-2026 for retail sale of liquor etc., at village Khuda Ali Sher. The licence is expiring on 31.03.2026. By virtue of impugned order dated 12.06.2025 (Annexure P- 8), respondents have issued a demolition order under Section 12(2) of the Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 as petitioner has contravened the provisions of the statute. 2. As the licence period is expiring in a few day, petitioner is granted protection till 31.03.2026. 3. With the above direction, writ petition is disposed of. 4. As the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application(s) shall also stand disposed of. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 23.03.2026 sapna Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No KUMARI SAPNA 2026.03.25 17.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document