Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62958 (BOM)

PANKAJ BHARATLAL NAGPURE v. STATE OF MAHA THR SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, GONDIA AND ANR

WP/328/2025 · 2025-12-02

Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri Raj D Wakode

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 910-Cri.WP-328-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.328 OF 2025 Pankaj BharatLal Nagpure, Tah. Khairlanji, Dist. Balaghat vs. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gondiya and ors. - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - – - -- - - - - - - Shri I. J. Damle, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ. DATED : 2nd December, 2025 Notice issued to petitioner is awaited. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has invited our attention to the prayer of the petition which indicates that petitioner has challenged order dated 18/03/2025 passed by respondent No.1- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Gondiya thereby externing him for a period of three months from the territorial jurisdiction of Gondiya district. 3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that three months have already passed and therefore nothing survives in the matter. 4. The submission appears to be correct. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as rendered infructuous. 5. The petitioner, however, is at liberty to revive the prayer if so desired. (Raj D. Wakode, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) Asmita 2025:BHC-NAG:13361-DB