Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62954 (ALL)

NEHA BHARTI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/16987/2025 · 2025-05-25

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:88919 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16987 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neha Bharti And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Maseeh,Wahaj Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioners have preferred the present petition with the following prayers:- (i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents decide the grievance/representation dated 13.05.2025 in accordance with law in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to hold meeting as earliest and finalize the process of selection of Fair price shop dealer in favour of the petitioner, in accordance with law. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the decision has been taken by the respondents to appoint him as fair price shop dealer but till date no action has been taken in the matter. It is argued that in this regard, various representations had been made by the petitioner and lastly he has submitted representation on 03.5.2025 before the respondents but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter. 4. On the other hand, it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that in case, the petitioner will submit fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the respondent No.3/District Supply Officer, Maharajganj, he will take a decision in the matter expeditiously. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file fresh representation along with relevant documents and certified copy of this order before the respondent No.3/District Supply Officer, Maharajganj, within a period of three weeks from today. In case, the petitioner does so, the respondent No.3 will take a decision in the matter strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of six weeks thereafter. Order Date :- 26.5.2025 saqlain Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad