APHC010058642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3080/2025 Between: 1. KANEKAL RAMA KRISHNA MANOHAR, S/O. K. RAMA KRISHNAPPA AGED 67 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 1-3-174/86 NEAR IDKAMADHEENA, KOYAMPUVVU, BADAVENE, III CROSS, GANGAVATHI TOWN, KOPPAL DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPT BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KALYANDURG, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, D. HIREHAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 5. K V JAYA KUMAR, S/O. LATE K. VASANTH KUMAR, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.5, III CROSS, NEAR SAINT FINOMINAL SCHOOL DODDAPAMCHANDRA, VIDYARANYAPUR POST, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA STATE. 6. SMT SUREKHA, W/O. HARISH DAS, AGED MAJOR, R/O. D.NO. 12- 123, NETHAJI NAGAR, PUNE CITY, MAHARASHTRA STATE. 2 7. KANEKAL RENUKHA SANJAY PHALNEKAR, D/O. LATE KANEKAL VASANTH KUMAR, AGED 46 YEARS. OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO.265, DVG RAOD, BTS LAYOUT, ARRAKERE, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA STATE. 8. KANEKAL VASANTHA KUMAR SURYA PRAKASH, S/O. LATE KANEKAL VASANTHA KUMAR, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO.265, DVG RAOD, BTS LAYOUT, ARRAKERE, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA STATE. 9. KANEKAL GAYATHRI LATISH KUMAR, W/O LATHISH KUMAR, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC SINECURE, R/O. D.N0.641-B, PARVATHAMMA KRUPA, 1ST MAIN, ALHANAHALLI, BADAVANE, MYSURU, KARNATAKA STATE. 10. KANEKAL NIVEDITHA SHASHIKANTH, W/O. SHASHIKANTH, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC SINECURE, R/O. D.NO.656, RANGASWAMY MAIN ALANAHALLI, MYSURU, KARNATAKA STATE. 11. KANEKAL MONISHA SRINIVAS, W/O SRINIVAS, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC SINECURE, R//O. D.NO.483, 9TH MAIN, 18TH CROSS, LALITHA MAHAL NAGAR, ALANAHALLI, MYSURU, KARNATAKA STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri N. Aswartha Narayana, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Smt. Surekha Harish Das, learned Counsel for Respondent No.5 (appeared through Video Conference) and Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3 2. Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Tahsildar, D. Hirehal, dated 05.02.2025. Copy of it is served on the Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and the same is taken on record. 3. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court by filing an appropriate Application for seeking protection of the Writ Petitioner’s interest. 4. Request granted. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Writ Petitioner to approach the Civil Court (Junior Division), Rayadurgam, for filing an appropriate Application. 6. Since the facts would indicate that the Official Respondents have mutated the Revenue Record behind the back of the Writ Petitioner, as contended by the Writ Petitioners, there shall be a direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rayadurgam, to dispose of the said Interlocutory Application, which is now proposed to be filed by the Writ Petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 06.02.2025 DSV