IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 Punjab National Bank Mrs. Anita Dangi CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in CWP Bank vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the respondents that sought by the petitioner.” the clear direction of this Court, possession of the property has not been given and even police protection has also not been provided to the petitioner even though two representations dated 11.10.2024 COCP-2709-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2709 of 2025 Date of decision : Punjab National Bank Versus Mrs. Anita Dangi and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mrs. Anuradha Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 30.7.2024 (Annexure P Bench of this Court in CWP-11038 of 2024 Bank vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the respondents that “…police protection would be provided as and when sought by the petitioner.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the clear direction of this Court, possession of the property has not been given and even police protection has also not been provided to the petitioner even though two representations dated 11.10.2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2709 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-27.05.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA s. Anuradha Gupta, Advocate Mr. Dushyant Saharan, AAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying (Annexure P-1) passed by the Division 11038 of 2024 titled as “Punjab National Bank vs. State of Haryana and others”, vide which the petition was disposed of on the basis of statement made by learned counsel for the “…police protection would be provided as and when counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the clear direction of this Court, possession of the property has not been given and even police protection has also not been provided to the petitioner even though two representations dated 11.10.2024 VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.29 11.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (Annexure P submitted by the petitioner. from Mr. Vivek Goyal, Tehsildar, Kalka submits that possession of the property shall be handed over to the petit positively. for the respondent that the present petition be disposed of as not pressed. May 27, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2709-2025 (O & M) xure P-2) and dated 20.3.2025 (Annexure P submitted by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent from Mr. Vivek Goyal, Tehsildar, Kalka submits that possession of the property shall be handed over to the petit positively. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be disposed of as not pressed. Disposed of as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 2) and dated 20.3.2025 (Annexure P-3) have been Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Mr. Vivek Goyal, Tehsildar, Kalka submits that possession of the property shall be handed over to the petitioner on dated 13.6.2025 In view of the above statement made by learned counsel State, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be disposed of as not pressed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.29 11.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document