Birendra Kumar Jha v. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MADHUBANI
CR. WJC/1798/2024 · 2025-07-14
Sandeep Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62908 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62908 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1798 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2022 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Birendra Kumar Jha Son Of Late Jagannath Jha Village- Majrahi, Ps- Rajnagar, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate, Madhubani Bihar
2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani Bihar
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Madhubani Bihar
4. The Station Head Officer, Rajnagar Police Station, Madhubani Bihar
5. The Investigation Officer, Rajnagar Police Station, Madhubani Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhakar Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr.S.C.22 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 14-07-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned counsel for the State.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: (i) For investigation of Rajnagar P.S Case No.39 of 2022 corresponding to G.R No. 25of 2022 instituted under sections 380 and 457 of the Indian Penal Code, to the higher independent police officer not concern to the Rajnagar police station to carry out fresh/denovo/reinvestigation
in
fair, comprehensive and transparent manner in the aforesaid case as the local police have under the influence of and in collusion with the
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1798 of 2024(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 accused persons who are directly or indirectly associated
with
the
high
profile bureaucratic/political party, completely failed to handle and to investigate the aforesaid case in right prospect on account of external interference/pressure; (ii) For direction to the Rajnagar police station head officer (respondent no. 4) to hand over the entire documents which has been recovered in the field, near the informant house, the said paper has been thrown by the unknown persons.
3. The learned counsel for the State has submitted that the investigation of the case has been concluded and the final form has been submitted.
4. In that view of the matter, this application is
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law in the Court below i.e., by way of filing a protest petition and in case, cognizance is not taken on the protest petition, a fresh complaint petition may be filed by the petitioner.
Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U