IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52218 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2025 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Parmatama Mishra @ Paramatama Mishra Son of Late Jamadar Mishra Resident of village - Bhawanipur (Bhawanipu), P.S.- Sangrampur District- East Champaran 2. Chitranjan Prasad son of Late Ram Bakas Bhagat @ Late Ram Baks Bhagat village- jagapakar, Ps - Harsidhi, Dist- East champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 203 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered total 5.580 liters of illicit English liquor from the hotel. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence as alleged against them and have falsely been implicated in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52218 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 present case due to highhandedness of the police. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the seized liquor. The petitioners have never indulged either in manufacturing or trading of the illicit liquor. There is a non-compliance of Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. which creates a serious doubt in the prosecution case. The petitioner no.1 has two criminal antecedents whereas petitioner no.2 has no criminal antecedent and are languishing in judicial custody since 31.05.2025 without any rhymes or reason. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioners, let the petitioners, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 203 of 2025, subject to the following conditions; (i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52218 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 members of the petitioners. (ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. rishi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T