Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62892 (PNJ)

RAVI KUMAR v. AJOY KUMAR SINHA IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/2667/2025 · 2025-09-25

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-2667 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 212 Ravi Kumar Shri Ajoy Kumar Sinha and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, 1. dated 18.02.2025 (Annexure P 2025, titled as ‘ 2. that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such as, (Annexure P the respondents complied with 3. 2667-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Ravi Kumar Versus Shri Ajoy Kumar Sinha and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Geeta Rani, Advocate for Mr. SPS Tinna, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Jastej Singh, Advocate for the respondent(s). NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 18.02.2025 (Annexure P-7) passed by the Writ Court 2025, titled as ‘Ravi Kumar vs. State of Punjab and others At the very outset, learned counsel for the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such as, in compliance of the order dated (Annexure P-7), a speaking order dated 16.05.2025 has been the respondents. Thus, the order passed by the Writ Court stands duly complied with. Heard. - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2667-2025 Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Geeta Rani, Advocate for Mr. SPS Tinna, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Jastej Singh, Advocate for the respondent(s). present petition has been filed alleging violation of order by the Writ Court in CWP-4440- State of Punjab and others’. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits instant petition has been rendered infructuous and may be in compliance of the order dated 18.02.2025 ), a speaking order dated 16.05.2025 has been passed by Thus, the order passed by the Writ Court stands duly present petition has been filed alleging violation of order submits instant petition has been rendered infructuous and may be passed by Thus, the order passed by the Writ Court stands duly RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.26 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2667 4. required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby accordingly. 5. speaking order, in accordance with law. 6. 7. 25.09.2025 rishu 2667-2025 -2- In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby accordingly. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid speaking order, in accordance with law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable - In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is required to be passed; and the present petition is hereby disposed of, The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No In view of the facts noted above, no further direction is disposed of, The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.26 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.