IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 116 GURNAM KAUR STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus official respondents well as her family members action on their representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the ver that the petitioner ha Senior Superintendent her grievances as been considered and no action has that at this stage, the issued to respondent No. Mohali to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: GURNAM KAUR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Nirbhay Garg, Advocate for the Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus official respondents No.2 to 4 to protect the life well as her family members at the hands of respondent their representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner has recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, S.A.S., Nagar, Mohali (Annexure P grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are respondent No. 3- Senior Superintendent decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.5472 of 2025 Date of decision: 26.05.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the fe and liberty of the petitioner as at the hands of respondents No. 5 to 8 and to take their representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-2). y outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted recently filed a representation on 21.05.2025 before the S.A.S., Nagar, Mohali (Annexure P-2) raising petition but the same has not yet been taken thereon. He further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are Superintendent of Police, S.A.S., Nagar, decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take of the the as take submitted before the raising petition but the same has not yet further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are S.A.S., Nagar, decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take Jyoti 2025.05.26 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to her 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on th of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the family members security in order to protect their li 26.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.5472 of 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the family members, the official respondents would provide security in order to protect their lives and liberty (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.5472 of 2025 -2- Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without e merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 3 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-2) of the petitioner within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioner as well as her , the official respondents would provide them adequate rty. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in Court, has the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without disposed the aforesaid of the petitioner within a accordance with as well as her them adequate Jyoti 2025.05.26 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document