IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104-1 CWP-15086-2024 (O&M) HAWA SINGH SON OF GOPI RAM ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents 104-2 CWP-15126-2024 (O&M) HAWA SINGH SON OF LAKHMI CHAND ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents A N D 104-3 CWP-15035-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.03.2025 SITA RAM ...Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. ***** Present: - Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate for the petitioners in all cases. Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana. ***** RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.03.24 01:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15086-2024 (O&M) + 2 cases -2- VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) CM-3918-CWP-2025 in CWP-15086-2024 CM-3878-CWP-2025 in CWP-15126-2024 CM-4090-CWP-2025 in CWP-15035-2024 The instant applications have been filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for fixing the actual date of hearing in the main cases. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed and the main cases are taken up on Board today itself. CM-3919-CWP-2025 in CWP-15086-2024 CM-3879-CWP-2025 in CWP-15126-2024 CM-4091-CWP-2025 in CWP-15035-2024 Applications are allowed as prayed for and the copies of judgment dated 05.03.2025 passed in LPA No.1865 of 2015 titled as “State of Haryana Versus Parmanand and others” as well as the copies of judgment dated 01.07.2024 passed in CWP-14504 of 2024 titled as “Ram Niwas versus State of Haryana and others” are taken on record as Annexures P-9 and P-10 respectively. MAIN CASES (O&M) Since similar issues are involved in the present cases, hence, they are being decided by a common order with the consent of Counsel for the parties. For the facility of reference, the prayer clause is being referred to from CWP-15086 of 2024 titled as ‘Hawa Singh son of Gopi Ram Vs. State of Haryana and others.’ RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.03.24 01:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15086-2024 (O&M) + 2 cases -3- The petitioner in the aforesaid petition has approached this Court for seeking issuance of directions to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for 2nd and 3rd ACP which is due since 2007 and 2017 respectively. Counsel for the respective parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in the present cases is squarely covered by the judgment dated 05.03.2025 passed in LPA No. 1865 of 2015 titled as “State of Haryana versus Parmanand and others” as well as the judgment dated 01.07.2024 passed in CWP-14504 of 2024 titled as “Ram Niwas versus State of Haryana and others”. The present petitions are accordingly allowed in terms of the judgments dated 05.03.2025 & 01.07.2024 (supra). All other misc. application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of accordingly. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MARCH 21, 2025. JUDGE Rajender Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2025.03.24 01:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document