p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.30024 of 2024 M/s. Rutuparna Construction, Bhubaneswar …. Petitioner Represented By Adv. – Mr. P.C. Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – Mr. S.B. Panda, Advocate (Additional Government Advocate) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO ORDER 28.01.2025 1. Mr. Nayak, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client has claimed for price adjustment. It is a good claim as was made. His client followed up by representation dated 5th June, 2024. There has been no action. That is why his client before Court seeking direction upon the Superintending Engineer to consider his client’s representation. Order No. 01. p. 2 2. Mr. Panda, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, the representation will be duly dealt with. 3. Opposite party no.3 is directed to consider and deal with representation dated 5th June, 2024. Petitioner will communicate certified copy of this order along with copy of the representation to said opposite party. Decision taken be made known to petitioner by three weeks from the communication. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. (Arindam Sinha) Acting Chief Justice (M.S. Sahoo) Judge Radha/Jyostna