Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62865 (KAR)

THE SLAO, ASST COMMISSIONER v. SRI HANAMANT S/O BASAPPA MADARKHANDI,

MFA/105489/2024 · 2025-10-30

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14719 MFA No. 105489 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 105489 OF 2024 (LAC-) BETWEEN: 1. THE SLAO, ASST. COMMISSIONER, JAMKHANDI-587301. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, NAVANGAR, BAGALKOT-587101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. DAYANAND SANGRESHI, HCGP) AND: SRI. HANAMANT S/O. BASAPPA MADARKHANDI, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUDHOL, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 74 (1) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT SITTING AT JAMKHANDI AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY, JAMAKHANDI IN LAC NO.5180/2021, DATED 10.11.2023 BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE; SET- ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT SITTING AT JAMKHANDI AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY, JAMAKHANDI IN LAC NO.5180/2021, DATED 10.11.2023 BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.11.03 12:22:05 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14719 MFA No. 105489 of 2024 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) The appeal was filed in the year 2024 and till now, office objections are not complied. This Court does not find any grounds to grant further time. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VMB CT-MCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3