Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62853 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/17097/2025 · 2025-05-25

Piyush Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:88940 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17097 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Chaudhary And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Dwivedi,Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that against the impugned order, the petitioner has equally, efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal / revision. Confronted with the said fact, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present writ petition at this stage. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed at this stage. Certified copy of the orders, if any, shall be returned to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining its photostat copy. Order Date :- 26.5.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad