Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010058262004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 722/2004
Between:
Vadapalli Jagannadham and Others
...APPELLANT(S) AND
Vadapalli Narayana Rao
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.
VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent:
1.
K V L JAYASIMHA The Court made the following Judgment:
Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that in spite of his best efforts, the appellants are not coming forward to prosecute the appeal and therefore necessary orders may be rendered in the Appeal.
2. No representation for the respondent.
2
3. In that view of the matter, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 24.04.2025 PSA
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 722 of 2004
Date: 24.04.2025 PSA