108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-39426-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.03.2026 Anshu ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Ms. Priya Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner on the compassionate ground. The case has been called twice since morning and despite that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. In view of the above, having left with no other option, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 10.03.2026 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2026.03.11 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.