NIRMAL KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/16804/2025 · 2025-05-29
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62800 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62800 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93564 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16804 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nirmal Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Shankar Mishra,Rishi Kant Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari call for the record of the case and quash the impugned order dated 07.04.2025 passed by the respondent no.2 (Commissioner Meerut, Division Meerut), in Revision/Case No.484 of 2025, (Computer Case No.C202511000000484), (Pappu @ Sanjeev Vs. Nirmal Kumar and others) and Revision/Case No.485 of 2025, (Computer Case No.C202511000000485), ((Pappu @ Sanjeev Vs. Pratap and others) under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. (annexed as annexure no.5)."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the restoration application filed by the petitioner was allowed against which revision was filed wherein record has been summoned by the order impugned and prayed that the order impugned may be quashed.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the revision is still pending and it would be appropriate that the petitioner may take his objections, if any, in the revision itself and respondent no. 2 be directed to decide the revision in a stipulated period.
5. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned revision, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 30.5.2025/Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad