Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62796 (PNJ)

JAGDISH SINGH PANAYCH v. STATE OF PUNJAB. AND ANR.

CWP/450/2007 · 2025-05-06

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 1013 Jagdish Singh Panaych State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. been released, however, for the interest, he shall file a representation which may be directed to be learned State counsel has no objection. 2. weeks, the same be decided within a further period of 3 receipt, in accordance with law. 06.05.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jagdish Singh Panaych Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. R.K.Girdhara, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that been released, however, for the interest, he shall file a representation which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. Disposed of. In case, the representation is weeks, the same be decided within a further period of 3 receipt, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-450-2007 (O & M) Date of decision: 06.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel submits that all the retiral benefits have been released, however, for the interest, he shall file a representation decided in a time bound manner, to which representation is filed within 4 weeks, the same be decided within a further period of 3 months from its (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.07 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.