Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62774 (KAR)

SHRI. BERNARD S/O. LATE GIRGOL BORGES v. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,

WP/100103/2024 · 2025-09-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13077 WP No. 100103 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 100103 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI BERNARD S/O. LATE GIRGOL BORGES AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. AMADALI-581301, KARWAR TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ S.BYAKOD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, FOR KONKAN RAILWAY, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, M G ROAD, KARWAR-581301 UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD., KARWAR-581301, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED. 01.08.2023 PASSED BY THE PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, KARWAR, UTTARAKANNADA IN EX P NO. 34/2022 PRODUCED VIDE ANENXURE-K AND ALLOW THE EX P FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 15/03/2022 FOR RECOVERY OF Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13077 WP No. 100103 of 2024 THE DECREETAL AMOUNT OF RS. 12,88,803/- FROM THE JDR VIDE ANNEXURE-H IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. B) SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LOK ADALATH HELD ON 18/12/2021 (PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR, UTTARAKANNADA) CLOSING THE EX NO. 109/2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ALLOW THE SAID EX P FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 28/04/2016 FOR RECOVERY OF THE REMAINING BALANCE OF DECREETAL AMOUNT OF RS. 7,19,721/- VIDE ANNEXURE-H IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 11.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM/CT:PA List No.: 3 Sl No.: 23