Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62773 (KAR)

SMT ANJUM KOUSAR SHAIKH v. SRI ADIL KAREEM PANCHAMAHALDAR S/O ABDUL HAMEED

RPFC/100226/2024 · 2025-10-10

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13697 RPFC No. 100226 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100226 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SMT. ANJUM KOUSAR SHAIKH W/O. ADIL KAREEM PANCHAMAHALDAR, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC. HOMEMAKER, R/O. AMAN COLONY, GURUNATH NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580024, NOW RESIDING AT H.NO.47, A-BLOCK, KRISHNA NAGAR, HALE HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ROSHAN SAHEB CHABBI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. ADIL KAREEM PANCHAMAHALDAR S/O. ABDUL HAMEED, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE SERVICE (NETWORK ENGINEER), R/O. SIMLA NAGAR, OLD HUBLI, HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-580024. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO a. SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14.11.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI IN CRIL. MISC. NO. 85/2024 THEREBY ALLOWING THE PRAYER MADE BY THE PETITION BEFORE THE LEARNED TRAIL COURT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Date: 2025.10.15 11:27:54 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13697 RPFC No. 100226 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the revision petition, which reads as under: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL “The Counsel for the Petitioner most humbly submits that, the undersigned Petitioner has informed the Counsel for the Petitioner that she does not intend to prosecute the top noted Petition and in view of the same, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to kindly permit the Petitioner to withdraw the top noted Petition, to meet the ends of justice and equity.” 2. In view of the memo, the revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly. SD/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE RKM CT:PA, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13