Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62748 (ALL)

LALIT KUMAR KAUSHIK v. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ANOTHER

WRIC/16778/2025 · 2025-05-29

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93271-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16778 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lalit Kumar Kaushik Respondent :- Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Utkarsh Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent no.2 in deciding the representations dated 22.04.2025 and 31.04.2025, filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representations before the respondent no.2, however the same have not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent no.2/Territory Manager Retail, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd, is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representations of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of three weeks from date, after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Shahroz (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad