Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62746 (PNJ)

NAVEEN GUPTA v. BHUSHAN POWER AND STEEL LTD. AND ANR

CRM-M/34573/2024 · 2025-04-22

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-34573-2024 (O&M) - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122-1 CRM-M-34573-2024 (O&M) Decided on : 14.07.2025 Naveen Gupta . . . Petitioner(s) Versus Bhushan Power and Steel Limited and another . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Shivender Pal Singh, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jograj Singh, Advocate and Mr. Vinish Singla, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Roopse Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Anil Kumar Lamdharia, Addl. PP, UT Chandigarh for respondent No.2. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) CRM-18100-2025 I. This is an application filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for seeking restoration of main petition i.e. CRM-M-34573-2024, which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 22.04.2025. II. Notice of this application was issued. III. Counsel for the applicant-petitioner submits that present application has been filed for revival of the main case, as the same is required to be withdrawn, to enable the applicant-petitioner to avail alternative remedy available to him to challenge the FIR, under the law. IV. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of counsel for the applicant-petitioner, prayer made in the application is JAWALA RAM 2025.07.16 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRM-M-34573-2024 (O&M) - 2 - allowed and the main case, i.e., CRM-M-34573-2024 is ordered to be restored to its original number. CRM stands disposed of. CRM-M-34573-2024 1. On oral request of the counsel for the petitioner, main case is taken up for hearing today itself. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the instant petition, in pursuance to the direction passed by the learned Magistrate, FIR has already been registered, therefore, he requires to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Thus, he seeks permission to withdraw present petition with aforementioned liberty. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought and recorded here- above. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 14, 2025 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No JAWALA RAM 2025.07.16 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document