Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62736 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/7367/2025 · 2025-05-22

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:88106 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7367 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Shukla Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aditya Prakash Verma,Shailesh Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief: "1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to examine the case and modify the pension of the petitioner on the basis of his last pay drawn of Rs. 62,200 instead of Rs. 58,600 with all consequential benefits and interest, within a stipulated time framed as deem fit and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case {Annexure no.2}." 3. It is submitted that in the above regard petitioner has approached the respondent No. 2 by making representation on 01.10.2024 but no order has been passed thereupon. 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection in the event representation of petitioner is directed to be disposed of by the respondent in accordance with law. 5. In view of the above this petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.2 to consider and dispose of the pending representation of petitioner dated 01.10.2024 within a period of two months from the production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law and by means of a reasoned and speaking order. Order Date :- 23.5.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad