Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62735 (PNJ)

VINAY KISANA @ NONI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/29582/2025 · 2025-07-07

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-29582-2025 (O&M) 211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29582-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2025 VINAY KISANA @ NONI AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present:- Mr. Sanjeev Trikha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG Punjab. SANJAY VASHISTH, J. 1. In the instant anticipatory bail petition, on 27.05.2025 following order was passed:- “ The Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.72 dated 20.04.2025 under Sections 118(1), 118(2), 191(3), 190 BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Sadar, District Hoshiarpur. Counsel contends that allegations to the petitioners is of causing of simple injury, as there is no opinion till date declaring the alleged injuries to be grievous. Thus concession of bail Notice of motion. Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Learned State counsel seeks time to file status report to the petition List on 07.07.2025.” 2. In compliance to order dated 27.05.2025, learned State counsel has filed the status report dated 21.06.2025, in Court today, which is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at appropriate JANKI BHATT 2025.07.08 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-29582-2025 (O&M) place. A copy thereof has been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner. 3. By referring to paragraph No.8 of the status report, Mr. Trikha, argues that the co-accused of the petitioner namely Rinku @ Ajay Kumar, who was attributed grievous injury has already been arrested on 29.04.2025 and petitioner No.1-Vinay Kisana @ Noni and petitioner No.2-Munna Kumar, both have been attributed the injuries with the sharp-edged weapon but both the injuries are simple in nature. 4. Extending his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioners informs that in fact the dispute has also been resolved between the parties as all the accused and all the victims have entered into a compromise on 02.07.2025 and the parties are in the process of filing of a petition for compromise quashing. 5. All the factual submissions addressed by learned counsel for the petitioners have not been disputed by learned DAG Punjab, except the factum of compromise between the parties. 6. In view of the submissions addressed hereinabove, I direct the petitioners to join the investigation within a period of two weeks from today or as and when required to do so by the Investigating Agency. In the event of their arrest, the petitioners shall be released on ad-interim bail, subject to their furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioners shall also be abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). 7. Besides, it is directed that petitioners would hand over their passports to the Investigating Agency or to Court concerned, if they possess. Otherwise, would submit an affidavit, disclosing the fact that they do not possess any passport. It is also directed that before leaving country any time JANKI BHATT 2025.07.08 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-M-29582-2025 (O&M) during trial, petitioners would seek prior permission of the Court. 8. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH ) 07.07.2025 JUDGE Janki Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2025.07.08 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh