Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:135342 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 964 of 2025 Applicant :- Jahid And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Adarsh Srivastava,Reena Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. application has been filed to quash the cognizance order dated 05.10.2015 as well as entire proceedings of Case No. 5854 of 2015 arising out of Case Crime No. 378 of 2015 under sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 of I. P.C., Police Station- Kotwali City, District Bulandshahr in pursuance of the Compromise Deed dated 06.12.2023 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that injuries are simple in nature and applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicant approached this Hon'ble Court by filing this 482 application with prayer to quash the proceedings on terms of compromise entered between the parties, the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 26.05.2025 sent the matter to trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 03.07.2025 verified the parties as well as compromise application, thereafter a letter has been transmitted to this Court on 09.07.2025 by the concerned court. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 compromised the matter and opposite party No.2 does not want to proceed the matter against the applicants. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled through compromise their private and civil dispute and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 4. Learned AGA submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the court, hence, no reason to proceed further. 5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non- compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 7. Accordingly, the proceedings of Case No. 5854 of 2015 arising out of Case Crime No. 378 of 2015 under sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 of I. P.C., Police Station- Kotwali City, District Bulandshahr, is hereby quashed. 8. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad