IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1425 of 2025 Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 _______________________________________________________ Praveen Devi …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ganesh Barowalia, Proxy counsel. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned Proxy Counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent development and as such, same may be disposed of. 2. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge March 04,2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?