AMINUL ISLAM v. ANWAR HUSSAIN AND ORS (SHAH ATA HUSSAIN SINCE DECEASED)
FA/32/2016 · 2025-06-18
Smita Das De, Soumen Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6269 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6269 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item-
3. sg 18-06-2025 Ct. 8
FA 32 of 2016 Aminul Islam Vs. Shah Ata Hussain, since deceased, represented by his legal heirs and representative namely, Anwar Hussain & Ors.
Mr. Probal Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Iqbal Hussain …for the appellant Mr. Arijit Bardhan Mr. V. Bose Mr. S. Abedin Mrs. Chitra Abedin Ms. Pooja Singh Mr. G. Mondal …for the applicants Mr. Kushal Chatterjee Mr. S. Bhattacharjee …for the respondent
1. The department has placed this matter for certain clarification.
2. It is clarified that by the order dated 10th June, 2025, FA 32 of 2016 was disposed of.
3. TCR shall be sent down to the learned Trial Court at the earliest.
4. We also clarify that the impugned judgment and decree is set aside.
5. However, there is a typographical error crept in the order dated 10th June, 2025.
6. In 8th line from the top of paragraph 2 at page 2 of the order transcribed under CAN 5 of 2023 in FA 32 of 2016, instead of ‘necessary parties”, it has been typed as
“necessary patties”.
7. Let this correction be incorporated in the order dated 10th June, 2025.
8. We request the learned Trial Judge to dispose of the partition suit as expeditiously as possible.
9. The earlier order dated 10th June, 2025 is clarified to the aforesaid extent.
10. This order shall form part of the order dated 10th June,
2025.
(Soumen Sen, J.) (Smita Das De, J.) 2