WASIM KHAN S/O. SULTAN KHAN AND OTHERS v. THE POLICE INSPECTOR, CITY CHOWK POLICE STATION, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER
WP/98/2023 · 2025-09-24
Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6267 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6267 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
73-wp-98-2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 73 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.98 OF 2023
1. Wasim Khan w/o Sultan Khan
2. Sultan Khan w/o Jumma Khan
3. Kausar Begum w/o Sultan Khan
4. Sufiyan Khan s/o Sultan Khan .. Petitioners Versus
1. The Police Inspector, City Chowk Police Station, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad.
2. Juhi Samreen w/o Wasim Khan .. Respondents ... Mr. Muhammad Aseem, Advocate for the Petitioner (Absent) Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for Respondent No.1/State. ...
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATE : 24 SEPTEMBER 2025
ORDER : . Learned Advocate for the petitioners is absent.
2. Learned APP produces daily status from E-Courts Services. It appears that on 31.10.2023 deposition of P.W.1 was recorded. Evidence was then part heard and learned APP submits that even now it is part heard. There may be a possibility that few more witnesses would be examined. Under such circumstance, when the trial has progressed, we do not take this to be the fit case where we should exercise our [1] 2025:BHC-AUG:27089-DB
73-wp-98-2023.odt constitutional powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed.
[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE scm [2]