THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NWKRTC, HUBLI, v. SADASHIV S/O BALAPPA DUMMANNAVAR,
MFA/100165/2015 · 2025-11-26
Chillakur Sumalatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62669 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62669 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16409 MFA No. 100165 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100165 OF 2015 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NWKRTC, HUBLI, THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, CHIKKODI DIVISION, CHIKODI, DISTRICT: BELGAUM.
(OWNER & INSURANCE CO. OF BUS NO.KA-23/F-491) …APPELLANT (BY MS. VINUTHA KHANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. C.R. MENSINKAI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. SADASHIV S/O. BALAPPA DUMMANNAVAR, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: MASON & AGRICULTURE, R/O. HUKKERI, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELGAUM …RESPONDENT (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS SERVED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT 1988 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.07.2014 IN M.V.C.NO.367/2013 PASSED BY THE LEARNED MEMBER ADDITIONAL M.A.C.T., HUKKERI AT HUKKERI AND THE APPEAL MAY KINDLY BE ALLOWED AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER:
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16409 MFA No. 100165 of 2015
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
Ms.Vinutha representing Sri. C. R. Mensinkai, learned counsel on record for the appellant seeks time. No ground what so ever is stated for adjourning the matter. The appeal is of the year 2015. On 24.07.2025 learned counsel for the appellant sought time and accordingly time was granted. Again on 06.11.2025 time was sought by learned counsel who represented the appellant and acceding to the request, time was granted. On 13.11.2025, there was no representation on appellant’s side. Yet to give fair opportunity, the matter was ordered to be listed on this day and accordingly the matter is listed. Again on this day time is sought. These facts reveal that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12