Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62668 (BOM)

DHIRAJBHAI PREMJIBHAI PATEL AND ANOTHER v. THE COLLECTOR, NAGPUR DISTRICT AND ANOTHER

CAO/958/2023 · 2025-11-10

Shri Pravin S Patil

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 13 CAO 958.23.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION [CAO] NO.958 OF 2023 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.18950 OF 2022 [REVIEW] IN FIRST APPEAL NO.129 OF 2013 [Dhirajbhai Premjibhai Patel and one .vs. The Collector, Nagpur District, Nagpur and one] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri G.C. Singh, Advocate h/f Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for Applicants. Shri H.D. Futane, AGP for Respondent No.1. ………. CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J. DATED : 10.11.2025 . 1. By this application, the applicants are seeking the condonation of delay of 225 days in filing the review petition. 2. The learned counsel for the applicants brought to my notice the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, dated 16.8.2021. 3. The perusal of the order of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India shows that on liberty sought by the applicants to file a review petition, the same was granted and accordingly Special Leave to Appeal was dismissed. 4. Hence, considering the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 225 days is hereby condoned. 5. The office is directed to register the review petition and list the matter in the next week. 6. Application stands disposed of. (PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) Gulande