Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 62659 (BOM)
PURUSHOTTAM DAULAT YEOLE v. MAROTI TOTARAM BILLEWAR(DEAD) THR HIS LRS
CAS/1144/2025 · 2025-12-08
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62659 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62659 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
14. SA 453 of 2005.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NO.1144/2025 AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NO.1143/2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.453/2005 Purushottam s/o Daulat Yeole ...Versus… Maroti s/o Totaram Billewar (Dead) through L.rs. Durgabai Wd/o Maroti Billewar and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -
Mr. S.D. Chopde, Advocate for appellant Mr. S.A. Mohta, Advocate for respondent No.1 (d) CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 08/12/2025
1. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the delay in filing the application for restoration of second appeal against respondent No.1 (b) is condoned and the second appeal is restored against the respondent No.1 (b).
2. Both civil applications are allowed and disposed of accordingly.
SECOND APPEAL NO.453/2005 List the appeal for final hearing on 11/12/2025.
(ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Wadkar 2025:BHC-NAG:13723