- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13983 MFA No. 102780 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102780 OF 2019 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SRI. CHANNAPPA S/O. BASAPPA GOURI, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, NOW NIL, R/O. LAXMESHWAR, NOW AT VAKKALGERI ONI, GADAG, TQ & DIST: GADAG-582101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GIRISH S. HULMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND SELF INSURANCE FUND, NWKRTC GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580020. 2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC, GADAG-582101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.M. KHANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, 1988 PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE HON’BLE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG AND MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE LEARNED JUDGE IN M.V.C.NO.330/2013 DATED 11TH MARCH 2019 AND ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AS PARYED FOR; COST OF THE APPEAL AND ETC., THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13983 MFA No. 102780 of 2019 CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) 1. Heard Sri.G. S. Hulmani, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Sri.Madanmohan M. Khannur, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Being aggrieved by the sum that is awarded as compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadag, through orders in MVC No.330/2013 dated 11.03.2019 the claimant therein preferred the present appeal. 3. Making his submission with regard to the merits of the matter, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant sustained three grievous injuries in a road traffic accident. He took extensive treatment for those injuries. As per Exhibit P10 - disability certificate, he is left with 48 to 50% disability. The appellant spent more than Rs.1,00,000/- for - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13983 MFA No. 102780 of 2019 treatment. But without considering the evidence produced, the Tribunal granted very meager sum as compensation and therefore the present appeal is filed. Learned counsel ultimately seeks for enhancement in compensation. 4. The submission that is made by learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand is that, though the appellant produced Exhibit P10 - disability certificate, he failed to establish the genuineness of the said certificate. Even the disability certificate does not reveal to which part of the body the said disability exists. Learned counsel further submits that the appellant even failed to establish his occupation and earnings by the date of accident. However learned counsel finally states that there may be marginal enhancement in the light of the submission that is made by learned counsel for the appellant. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13983 MFA No. 102780 of 2019 5. Though the appellant contended that, as an agriculturist, he was earning Rs.10,000/- per month, no substantive proof is produced to that effect. Likewise, appellant failed to establish even the aspect of disability in clear terms. However, based on the evidence produced, the appellant succeeded in establishing that he had sustained a fracture over 1/3rd of radius with fracture of the lower end of ulna left and fracture of the left clavicle which are grievous in nature. Also it is brought on record in clear terms that he took treatment as an inpatient for a period of one week. 6. The Tribunal granted a sum of Rs.15,000/- only under the head ‘pain and suffering’ and Rs.6,000/- only towards ‘loss of earnings during treatment period’. The amount thus awarded is on lower side, as rightly contended by learned counsel for the appellant. Further, as rightly contended, the sum granted that is Rs.6,000/- towards traveling and other expenses is - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13983 MFA No. 102780 of 2019 also on lower side. No amount is awarded as compensation towards loss of amenities. 7. Thus, considering these factors, this Court is of the view that the amount awarded as compensation is required to be enhanced by Rs.70,000/- globally, which includes interest. Therefore, the appeal is disposed of with the following order: ORDER i. The appeal is allowed in part. ii. The compensation that is granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gadag, through orders in MVC No.330/2013 dated 11.03.2019, is enhanced by Rs.70,000/-. iii. Respondents are directed to deposit the enhanced sum within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13983 MFA No. 102780 of 2019 iv. On such deposit, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the entire amount. Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38