Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6265 (RAJ)

ANITA DAUGHTER OF PYARELAL v. ANJU DAUGHTER OF PYARELAL

CW/2511/2025 · 2025-03-12

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11398] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2511/2025 Anita Daughter Of Pyarelal, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Kudli, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.) At Present Resident Of Raseedpura, Khuri Badi, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner/Plaintiff Versus 1. Anju Daughter Of Pyarelal, Resident Of Piprali Road, Nala Ka Balaji Tan Kudli, Tehsil And District Sikar. ...Defendant no.2/ Respondent 2. Rajendra Son Of Rughnath 3. Shivbhagwan Son Of Geedaram 4. Nemichand Son Of Pyarelal 5. Sunita Daughter Of Rajendra, All 2 to 5 are Residents Of Piprali Road, Nala Ka Balaji, Tan Kudli, Tehsil And District Sikar. 6. Sanju Daughter Of Pyarelal 7. Sunita Daughter Of Pyarelal, Both 6 and 7 are Residents Of Piprali Road, Nala Ka Balaji, Tan Kudli, Tehsil And District Sikar. ...Respondents 8. Pyarelal Son Of Geedaram, Resident Of Village Kudli, Tehsil And District Sikar (Rajasthan). 9. Nikita Daughter Of Pyarelal, Resident Of Village Kudli, Tehsil And District Sikar (Rajasthan) At Present Residing At Raseedpura, Tehsil-Sikar, Gramin Jila Sikar (Rajasthan). 10. Naresh Son Of Pyarelal, Resident Of Village Kudli, Tehsil And District Sikar (Rajasthan). 11. State Of Rajasthan Through Tehsildar, Sikar, District Sikar. 12. Sub-Registrar Officer, Sikar, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, AG with Ms. Dhriti Laddha and Ms. Harshita Thakral [2025:RJ-JP:11398] (2 of 2) [CW-2511/2025] Mr. Alok Sogani HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 12/03/2025 This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties with the assistance of learned Advocate General: “(1) The order dated 24.01.2025 passed by the Board of Revenue Rajasthan, Ajmer in revision petition no.274/2025: Anju vs. Rajendra and Others is quashed and set aside. (2) The Court of Sub-Divisional Officer, Sikar is directed to decide the application no.3/2025 within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order without being influenced by the observations made by the Board of Revenue in the order dated 24.01.2025.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /60