SRI AMITKUMAR S/O. MANJUNATH BASAVAMURTHY v. THE STTAE OF KARNATAKA
WP/100127/2025 · 2025-10-30
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62636 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 62636 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14747 WP No. 100127 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 100127 OF 2025 (S-TR) BETWEEN:
SRI. AMITKUMAR S/O. MANJUNATH BASAVAMURTHY, AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. ENGLISH LECTURER, R/O. CTS NO.2468, PLOT NO.33, B.K KANGRALI ROAD, SHAHU NAGAR, TQ AND DIST. BELAGAVI - 590 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SADANAND M. KENCHARAVAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION, 18TH CROS ROAD, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 012.
2.
THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORUTY CUM DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PR-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION 18TH CROSS ROAD, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM , BENGALURU - 560 012.
3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION, DIST. BELAGAVI - 590 001. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE
Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14747 WP No. 100127 of 2025
RESPONDENT BANK VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
This Court by order dated 26.09.2025 had passed the following order:
“Three weeks’ time granted finally to comply with the office objections. If the office objections are not complied by 27.10.2025, relist on 30.10.2025 for dismissal.”
Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non- compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
Kmv CT-GTB