Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62603 (KAR)

MANJUNATH NAIK S/O LATE GANAPATI NAIK v. VAJGOD GROUP GRAMAGALA SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA NI.

WP/104980/2024 · 2025-09-24

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13140 WP No. 104980 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 104980 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: MANJUNATH NAIK S/O LATE GANAPATI NAIK AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS OCC. RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O JOGALIKAATTE, HALADIPUR POST TALUK HONNAVAR UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DEEPAK S SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. VAJGOD GROUP GRAMAGALA SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA NI. VAJGOD, LAMBAPURA, TALUK SIDDAPUR DIST UTTARA KANNADA NOW IT IS VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA LAMBAPURA, POST VAJGOD TALUK SIDDAPURA 581 322 DIST UTTARA KANNADA 2. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, SIRSI SUB DIVISION, UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT 581 401. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) ISSUE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, DIRECTION TO QUASH THE Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13140 WP No. 104980 of 2024 ORDER DATED. 16-11-2022 IN CO-OP APPEAL NO. 96/2021 PASSED BY THE HON BLE KARNATAKA APPELLANT TRIBUNAL AT BENGALURU, THE COPY OF WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A.B) ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF WRIT WHICH THIS HONOURABLE TRIBUNAL DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE ALONG WITH THE COST OF THIS APPLICATION MAY KINDLY BE GRANTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 11.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM CT:PA List No.: 3 Sl No.: 96