Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 62581 (ALL)

PINTU v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/17275/2025 · 2025-09-24

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17275 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Ravi Anand Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent - U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed praying inter alia for the following relief: "(a) a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned letter no.323 dated 24-03-2025 of the respondent no.3, and order/letter no. 830 dated 28-03-2025 of the respondent no.4 whereby petitioner's allotment of plot no. 3/97 at Jagriti Vihar Yojana no.11, Meerut has been cancelled (Annexure no.1). (b) Certiorari quashing the notice of e-auction dt. 27:05.2025 in reference to the plot of petitioner being plot no. 3/97 at Jagriti Vihar Yojana no.11, Meerut (serial No. 11 in the auction notice). (c) Mandamus commanding the respondents not to create any third party right and auction / allot the plot no. 3/97 at Jagriti Vihar Yojana no.11, Meerut in favour of any other person." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pranshu Gupta, Shivam Yadav, Pramod Kumar Singh, Sunil Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ravi Anand Agarwal, Vineet Pandey Pintu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that for the same cause of action, the petitioner has already preferred Writ-C No. 15331 of 2025, which is pending consideration. He, therefore, submits that the present writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to move an appropriate amendment application in the earlier writ petition. 4. In view of the aforesaid statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty as prayed. September 25, 2025 NLY WRIC No. 17275 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad