IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106) CWP-37621-2025 Date of Decision : 30.04 2026 M/s Harshika Motors and anothers .. Petitioners Versus State Bank of India .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: None. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. The aforesaid writ petition was e-filed. The petition was scrutinized and approved by the Registry, but after its approval, hard copy, which is mandatory, has not been supplied. The Registry has consequently listed the matter before this Court being incomplete and duplicate case seeking appropriate orders. 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the petition being incomplete and duplicate. The petition, as such is disposed of for want of requisite action from the counsel. However, liberty is granted to file the petition afresh in case needed. File be consigned to record room. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 30.04.2026 (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) sonia JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No SONIA BURA 2026.04.30 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document